<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DomainUpdater.com Registry spam</title>
	<atom:link href="/2007/08/21/domainupdatercom-registry-spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2007/08/21/domainupdatercom-registry-spam/</link>
	<description>Tips and tricks to get technology to work for you, by Michael Boyd Clark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Clark</title>
		<link>/2007/08/21/domainupdatercom-registry-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-15652</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 14:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetmike.com/journal/2007/08/21/domainupdatercom-registry-spam/#comment-15652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giving false information on a domain registration is cause for losing the registration, plus any registration fees you&#039;ve paid. That is one of the silliest suggestions I&#039;ve heard in a while. All that ICANN has to do is make using DNS whois records for commercial communications illegal. Of course, that decision would cost CIANN money, and they would never do that. As for getting them to actually enforce their rules - Ha!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Giving false information on a domain registration is cause for losing the registration, plus any registration fees you&#8217;ve paid. That is one of the silliest suggestions I&#8217;ve heard in a while. All that ICANN has to do is make using DNS whois records for commercial communications illegal. Of course, that decision would cost CIANN money, and they would never do that. As for getting them to actually enforce their rules &#8211; Ha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fool who didn't give his name</title>
		<link>/2007/08/21/domainupdatercom-registry-spam/comment-page-1/#comment-15559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fool who didn't give his name]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 21:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetmike.com/journal/2007/08/21/domainupdatercom-registry-spam/#comment-15559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Its not NS fault. If you registered the domain name with any of your emails you are going to get spam because harvesting software will go through the whois info of your domain name and see your email address. It is usally a good idea to use a junk email address for the domain name.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not NS fault. If you registered the domain name with any of your emails you are going to get spam because harvesting software will go through the whois info of your domain name and see your email address. It is usally a good idea to use a junk email address for the domain name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
