<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Checking your Installation DVD</title>
	<atom:link href="/2005/05/14/checking-your-installation-dvd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2005/05/14/checking-your-installation-dvd/</link>
	<description>Tips and tricks to get technology to work for you, by Michael Boyd Clark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Hayward</title>
		<link>/2005/05/14/checking-your-installation-dvd/comment-page-1/#comment-7421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Hayward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 08:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetmike.com/journal/?p=165#comment-7421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The check is pointless. If there was a scratch on the DVD, OS X wouldn&#039;t install anyway (I&#039;m assuming it would do something similar to what Windows does; ie keep asking for the file it can&#039;t find).

Your observation is correct, but what I find amusing is that the system is still completely non bootable if an error is found. It would be pointless to continue to install if errors WERE detected.

I&#039;m commenting because I&#039;m bored, I&#039;m trying to get OS X, Windows and Ubuntu to play ball; and as per usual I haven&#039;t followed the instructions, and so am suffering greatly.

Yes, I realise that I&#039;m commenting over a year later than the actual post, but anything to keep me awake, goes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The check is pointless. If there was a scratch on the DVD, OS X wouldn&#8217;t install anyway (I&#8217;m assuming it would do something similar to what Windows does; ie keep asking for the file it can&#8217;t find).</p>
<p>Your observation is correct, but what I find amusing is that the system is still completely non bootable if an error is found. It would be pointless to continue to install if errors WERE detected.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m commenting because I&#8217;m bored, I&#8217;m trying to get OS X, Windows and Ubuntu to play ball; and as per usual I haven&#8217;t followed the instructions, and so am suffering greatly.</p>
<p>Yes, I realise that I&#8217;m commenting over a year later than the actual post, but anything to keep me awake, goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
